experimental detail
A Experimental Details
We make use commute time'JWMNP' as the target The California datacenter has access to all of the features. The Texas datacenter has access to all but'AGEP', 'SCHL '. For each method that we test, we run 20 trials to form 95% confidence intervals. Optimized-Naive-Collab, described in Section 6. As the Schur complement is also p.s.d.
- North America > United States > Texas (0.24)
- North America > United States > California (0.24)
- North America > United States > Illinois (0.04)
Anchor Function
Figure 7: Actual example of how an anchor function impacts the generated solution. In this section, we provide additional experimental details and results for the experiments in Section 3. We include additional details for anchoring (Appendix A.1), the availability heuristic (Appendix A.3), Filtering prompts for longer canonical solutions. However, all components of the prompts from Section 3.3.2 We plot the analogous add-var results in Figure 10 and include full numerical results in Table 7. In this section, we augment Section 3.3.3
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Berkeley (0.14)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.05)
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.04)
Appendix A Experimental Details
This is referred to as DOC-Feat in [24]. COT uses the empirical estimator of the Earth Mover's Distance between labels from the source domain and softmax outputs of samples from the target A.2 Dataset Details In this section, we provide additional details about the datasets used in our benchmark study. Overall, we obtain 5 datasets (i.e., CIFAR10v1, CIF AR100 Similar to CIFAR10, we use the original CIFAR100 set as the source dataset. Overall, we obtain 3 different domains. Overall, we obtain 3 different domains.